[osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file

[James Killian]

I tried 2.4.8 and 2.6 for both VS 7.1 and VS 9:

Unfortunately for VS 7.1 (does not matter if its 2.4.8 or 2.6) I get this 
error:
------ Build started: Project: OpenThreads, Configuration: Debug 
Win32 ------

Compiling...
Atomic.cpp
\Games\GremlinGames\Source\Utilities\OSG_SVN\OpenSceneGraph\src\OpenThreads\common\Atomic.cpp(66) 
: error C3861: 'MemoryBarrier': identifier not found, even with 
argument-dependent lookup
\Games\GremlinGames\Source\Utilities\OSG_SVN\OpenSceneGraph\src\OpenThreads\common\Atomic.cpp(92) 
: error C3861: 'MemoryBarrier': identifier not found, even with 
argument-dependent lookup



VS 9 appears to build fine as MemoryBarrier resides in winnt.h   my guess.. 
there is a compiler version check that is greater that 7.1 to use.


What DOES work, is the config file detecting interlocked (as you verified), 
I wonder why the use float bounding box and use float bounding sphere are 
float by default... perhaps this is a general default for all platforms. 
I've been using double instead, and things run fine.

Oh yes, and the projects which are dependent on Open Threads and OSG now 
include the build directory, so while I do not quite understand the install 
workflow that you were saying it appears that we can build the solution 
without needing to do anything with install.  To me the install is a folder 
which is ran last where, once the build has built successfully I click the 
install to put the stuff together, and then our client code includes and 
links to this folder... that way when the code breaks the install folder is 
still fine from the previous successful session.




James Killian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jean-Sébastien Guay" <jean-sebastien.guay at cm-labs.com>
To: "OpenSceneGraph Users" <osg-users at lists.openscenegraph.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in 
aseparateConfig include file


> Hi James,
>
>> Thanks for explaining things:
>
> No problem, that's what we're there for. :-)
>
>> Well I'll give Cmake 2.6 another shot.  I tried it too early before and 
>> it had some strange behavior.  Hopefully now since a lot of people are 
>> using it I'll feel a bit more confident that it will work.  I may get 
>> back with you on the Install workflow, but I'll need to see how 2.6 looks 
>> first.
>
> For sure give it a shot. It should work as intended out of the box for OSG 
> out of SVN.
>
> J-S
> -- 
> ______________________________________________________
> Jean-Sebastien Guay    jean-sebastien.guay at cm-labs.com
>                                http://www.cm-labs.com/
>                         http://whitestar02.webhop.org/
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> osg-users at lists.openscenegraph.org
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
>