[osg-users] glCopyTexImage2D or Frame Buffer Object
robert.osfield at gmail.com
Wed Apr 20 01:00:28 PDT 2011
2011/4/20 "Martin Großer" <Grosser.Martin at gmx.de>:
> Ok thank you. And what do you think about osg::Texture2D::copyTexImage2D(...)? Is this a worse solution than the FBO?
In what respect? Performance wise rendering directly to a texture
using FBO is likely to be more efficient than rendering to the frame
buffer and then using Texture2D::copyTextImage2D(..). Using FBO's is
also more flexible as there is no need to write the frame buffer
multiple times within one frame.
More information about the osg-users