[osg-users] CompositeNodeCallback : useful addition?

Robert Osfield robert.osfield at gmail.com
Fri Oct 26 06:56:04 PDT 2007


You can nested callbacks within each other right now.  It's a bit
awkward but does work for doing multiple callbacks.

The issued you have with your approach is that you call the callbacks
in series and don't provide a mechanism for traversal - rather it
assumes that each callback would call the traverse on subgraph or not
at all.  This might be OK for some callbacks types that fall into a
pre or post callback style, but not ones that are in effect traversal


On 10/26/07, Jean-Sébastien Guay <jean-sebastien.guay at polymtl.ca> wrote:
> Hello Robert,
> I was wondering about something. I find the nesting of node callbacks
> a bit less intuitive and transparent than it could be, and I was
> wondering if there would be interest in a small class I made called
> CompositeNodeCallback. It's simply a vector of NodeCallbacks where the
> class's operator() calls the operator() of each NodeCallback in the
> vector. So in effect it implements the Composite and Decorator
> patterns for NodeCallbacks.
> The other useful thing is that it has some static methods that allow
> you to add a NodeCallback to either the update, event or cull
> callbacks on a node, and it will transparently add a
> CompositeNodeCallback if needed, or add the callback to an existing
> CompositeNodeCallback if there is one. So in effect, you just replace
> any
> node->setUpdateCallback(callback);
> with
> CompositeNodeCallback::addUpdateCallback(node, callback);
> and it takes care of everything for you.
> I know I find it useful, because I have been bitten a few times when
> setting a callback on a node that already had one, so it was replaced.
> And I find having to manage nested callbacks manually is tedious. So I
> appreciate this being automatic.
> My question is, would this be useful in the OSG core. I'm including
> the code in case you want to see exactly what it does. If you decide
> it could be included, I'll gladly make the changes needed (osg
> namespace, comment copyright header, etc.) to make it a valid
> submission.
> Thanks,
> J-S
> --
> ______________________________________________________
> Jean-Sebastien Guay     jean-sebastien.guay at polymtl.ca
>                          http://whitestar02.webhop.org/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> osg-users at lists.openscenegraph.org
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org

More information about the osg-users mailing list